From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41423: Installing the fix for bug#41423 on emacs-27 (was: 27.0.91; eshell file completion in tramp dir is slow (3 minutes) [regression on pretest]) Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:47:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83bld37sly.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86k116inmr.fsf@sacsa.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <86tv0aecgn.fsf@gmail.com> <87r1v4z3f1.fsf_-_@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26287"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rrandresf@gmail.com, 41423@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 15:47:20 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aU4-0006hx-0N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:47:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aU3-000471-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:47:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTm-00044t-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTm-0004ld-EK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:47:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTm-0005lA-Bu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:47:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41423.161219080822116 (code B ref 41423); Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2021 14:46:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTX-0005kc-9z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39696) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTU-0005kN-4p for 41423@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:46:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53333) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTO-0004Zk-1w; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:46:38 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4672 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l6aTN-0006tr-JX; Mon, 01 Feb 2021 09:46:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:36:09 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199079 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: andrés ramírez , > 41423@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:36:09 -0500 > > IIUC Michael had marked this bug as "blocking" for Emacs-27, so this > argues for installing it on the `emacs-27` branch. > > The patch is not without risks seeing how it changes a function from > returning a list to returning a function and how it fundamentally > changes *when* the code is executed. So I'm not sure whether it should > go on the `emacs-27` branch: > > A- For non-Eshell users it is "obviously safe". > B- For Eshell-over-Tramp users it should be a clear improvement even if > it turns out to introduce some unforeseen regressions in some cases. > C- Finally, Eshell-not-over-Tramp users should hopefully see no > difference at all, which mostly means no improvement to make up for > any risk of regression. > > So, is the improvement in B worth the risk in C? No, I don't think so.