From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44743: native-comp: confirm-exit-emacs warns about active processes when compiling Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:23:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83blc6otxr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y2iwz2eq.fsf@gnu.org> <87eekj8a4t.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn42u5fz.fsf@gnu.org> <83pn0nqpf7.fsf@gnu.org> <8335xirk9a.fsf@gnu.org> <20y2faefk4.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13005"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rgm@gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, akrl@sdf.org, 44743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 27 08:24:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtxV-0003Fq-L0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 08:24:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59922 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtxU-00036S-Oy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:24:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtxL-00036K-Tk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59793) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtxJ-00071U-V3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:24:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtxJ-00061v-RF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:24:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44743.161441062923162 (code B ref 44743); Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Feb 2021 07:23:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43106 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtx7-00061V-BA for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtx6-00061I-7U for 44743@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwz-0006d5-MM; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4159 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lFtwu-00050u-SR; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 02:23:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:14:30 -0600) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200921 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:14:30 -0600 > Cc: Andrea Corallo , Eli Zaretskii , 44743@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org > > > Since the whole file is new, you could just tag the defgroup. > > Thanks. Will that propagate to the individual options? > > This seems not to give the "This variable was introduced" message: > > (progn (defgroup foo nil "foo" :version "28.1") > (defcustom bar nil "foo" :group 'foo) > (describe-variable 'bar)) > > Do we care to have that message? I think we do, otherwise why have it?