From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:09:16 +0300
Message-ID: <83bl3cyltv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net>
 <83a6ix12k8.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh5q9dz.fsf@posteo.net> <831r490xfh.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkm=Zm53Dwimj5oSeDsLHGwftJAEtfgU3AzGjxFTWtHHNpw@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="28530"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 26 15:12:38 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mfMFq-0007CI-Cg
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:12:38 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53802 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1mfMFp-0005Ti-8t
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:12:37 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59752)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1mfMCh-0001RG-Fn
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:09:23 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54982)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mfMCf-0000Vy-DZ; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:09:21 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=EiVY07SaA5f/5DDUG1GoS3+iBjTWSEQxh+W/+yLrVys=; b=Z49R/EnwjOp/
 LqkxSEtNsI1YbSd+CEgIqgp34DZidObbWBbecIN2eZ8gie30SByL/PyME045OmDPFrYdqa9B1VDfs
 lF9vk4yxcjxOXlaKq08q2Shbv+zJyxint0VHPvg4PhlSdPTDKcXb+5bzatTmwbYIcPqddJDEUE+Z5
 GR3ZF5MesCuAhrk5KuCPx6QKre+xdZfv8XahERAMHVD0cfGo7vVaxsUKJrw7y5pMe6IJhND9OlI5E
 SgSRGyHjbo7tj8QhCn+SZcZlESryPFhv/vOwXLkVsnhQItyDHlLhfzEkLypEwCGqfJVczA/tHKMZM
 SHPBdSu6+v2vy4VbLIj24Q==;
Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4839 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1mfMCe-0001rR-Tn; Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:09:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=Zm53Dwimj5oSeDsLHGwftJAEtfgU3AzGjxFTWtHHNpw@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:24:11 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277848
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/277848>

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 12:24:11 +0200
> Cc: Philip Kaludercic <philipk@posteo.net>, Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > > If anything, I think XDG is becoming more and more popular since 2003,
> > > and I wouldn't know of any other serious contender to replace XDG.
> >
> > Yes, XDG is the current fashion.  As were the ones before it.
> 
> Which ones would that be?

Is it important?