From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53740: 29.0.50; Buffers->Frames menu lists F1 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 18:49:01 +0200 Message-ID: <83bkzn520y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6f891oz.fsf@yahoo.com> <834k5g5oys.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0ec6zos.fsf@yahoo.com> <83tudg44z3.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkzo9q4g.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmo443av.fsf@gnu.org> <877dac9obe.fsf@gmail.com> <83k0ec416s.fsf@gnu.org> <8735l09iwh.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9773"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 53740@debbugs.gnu.org, chadpbrown@gmail.com To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 17:52:47 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfLi-0002Kc-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 17:52:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52006 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfLg-0007jF-B9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:52:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45018) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfJ4-00069z-CJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:35495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfJ3-0006F6-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:50:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfJ3-0003Tt-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:50:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53740 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 53740-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53740.164390694313307 (code B ref 53740); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 16:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53740) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2022 16:49:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfI7-0003SZ-2C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37858) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfI5-0003S4-Pk for 53740@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=34892 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfI0-00065z-F0; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:48:56 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fNUWw4jZQ7FPEO4T8YjlYFHw4TJ/Cnk4UFxHu6VgVTs=; b=HcZys7zhkqDA lgxJs25N3obwajmxjWJPryzW+LmCD0pz6oEnDOH5hOndz9hykO/NdvYMbd2Sp77WPQBQ1+pZPhiTl VLw9hTT3WbiwpHV4w++7PLdrbnwjXPCrzbY66/y4XzYl0h9CJ2995ZcW6w77DwQyygzrsSRV3eLu3 YxbHGjzC0aOBjY91S4eJReHOhhV9xfp86A0jc4rlmCnZHCT2IXXbEjbVsatkT4JqIA5O55QFHZA/s f9ZHaXI3g6SiRzEiYWwzu535HKYByygZcJ+ufZzGT+EHkLJP0sz/ipuxeqy5gHlZcnt1TqXM9BCh0 8yy7WhtkHj04iWV66gI9/w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4254 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFfHz-00028j-VL; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 11:48:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8735l09iwh.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Thu, 03 Feb 2022 14:30:54 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225901 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 53740@debbugs.gnu.org, chadpbrown@gmail.com > Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 14:30:54 +0100 > > >>>>> On Thu, 03 Feb 2022 13:52:27 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: > > >> From: Robert Pluim > >> Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 53740@debbugs.gnu.org, chadpbrown@gmail.com > >> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 12:33:57 +0100 > >> > >> Would it be useful to have the TTY frames named something other than > >> Fn? > > Eli> By default? (Because we already have "M-x set-frame-name".) What > Eli> would you call them? > > "Fn " or similar? Is that really so different? It will take more space on the mode line, for starters.