From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59320: Acknowledgement (29.0.50; (Windows) Cursor is invisble unless inhibit-double-buffer is t, and then it only appears as a single pixel line) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:44:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83bkoxzsyl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pmdf15z9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilj633i4.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40256"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: kcbanner@gmail.com, 59320@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 14:44:25 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq36-000AD1-Kv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:44:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2m-00087v-Vc; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:44:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2l-00087S-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2k-0003BD-Lk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2k-0005nG-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59320 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59320.166921104122247 (code B ref 59320); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2022 13:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54186 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2i-0005mk-TR for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2Z-0005mA-OA for 59320@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:43:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2U-0003A8-Cg; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:43:46 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Yrg0eZ1cnnCFnogjqvhROunPYnHQopun8Pr0lWwKoFA=; b=RGhfJUeVd4or AnkSa4N0wXX2ruEsEeg8xzfqja4HVgPLUHzlCbnJ55OY3Mgr7qeDdjkLVI3NOW1/fq22dWHt7bwEO f9Pcwo3ifLdmsQxMuAj0E/FpQjMW2cZdScezhS+lLx0xhG6/fR3LQLuBYTajMhFEW2+iitApbzyJH IAL4vrHOfsmfNZzQl/M7lAX1/j61+aCfBR/HHKobVQCCiCw55mM6A64mvf0W+1JG8h0XxQ4KB8ALW TSVz9UoCqkBJpvyBrrASO2o29IezSyYH7QyXppXsae1xTUOXRo2D+wIseTzCTDY/GZgGy/k1Pbs7d t6fMtdmReNIFL/Kw440u9w==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxq2T-00019s-Kg; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:43:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ilj633i4.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:42:43 +0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248741 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: Casey Banner , 59320@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:42:43 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > So I guess we should disable double-buffering on Windows when system caret > > is in use? > > I'd only do that if all else fails. How does MS-Windows display the > system caret, and why can't it be made to work with double-buffering? I don't know the answer to the second part, but if you search the C sources for w32_use_visible_system_caret, you will probably see the answer right away (there aren't many hits).