From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Confused about emacs-23 revno: 100005 Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:12:09 +0300 Message-ID: <83aao6kt86.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83hbield4o.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbiewhv2.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1283051434 31570 80.91.229.12 (29 Aug 2010 03:10:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 03:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 29 05:10:33 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpYHr-000575-5Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:10:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59380 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpYHq-0003kq-Hd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:10:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39815 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OpYHk-0003ja-C2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:10:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpYHj-000110-51 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:45148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OpYHi-00010r-Ti; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 23:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L7W00I008O44U00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:10:06 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.93.239]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L7W00H8X8STX470@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:10:06 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:129377 Archived-At: > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 21:46:56 -0400 > > Maybe the mail reached emacs-diff but was above the list size threshold? > emacs-diff admin, can you shed any light? :) Unless it is discarded automatically (I don't think it does), it never reached emacs-diffs, because I would certainly have let it be sent to the list.