From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:18:17 +0200 Message-ID: <83aakz91t2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> <83fwur933c.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3pv92az.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290547030 3025 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 21:17:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 22:17:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0EX-00033i-Dj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:17:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL0EW-0003VM-OJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34040 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PL0EN-0003TG-CW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0EL-0005r5-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PL0EK-0005oU-T7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCC00C00WDFST00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:16:18 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.9.106]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCC00CC2WF236B0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:16:15 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133086 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:10:59 +0100 >=20 > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrot= e: > >> From: Lennart Borgman > >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:57:39 +0100 > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Eli Zaretskii wr= ote: > >> >> From: Lennart Borgman > >> >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:56:11 +0100 > >> >> Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> >> > >> >> >> > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users r= elease binaries > >> >> >> > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, peri= od. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please explain why you think that. > >> >> > > >> >> > I just did, above. > >> >> > >> >> In what way is "pointless" an explanation? > >> > > >> > I meant the second sentence. > >> > >> Can you then explain if you think there is any reason not to shi= p the > >> release binaries with debug info? > > > > I said it is slightly better, that's all. =C2=A0The reason is dis= k space, > > of course: 30MB is a lot for a binary. >=20 > Why do you then think it is pointless to ship both binaries with de= bug > info and without it? It should be clear: it's even more disk space waste.