From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7626: 23.2.91; Rmail shows incorrect message encoding in the mode line Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:47:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83aakaibb8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ei9miqef.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292212363 2070 80.91.229.12 (13 Dec 2010 03:52:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 13 04:52:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzSl-000482-Md for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:52:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRzSk-0002Gr-Uc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43904 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PRzSg-0002Ga-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzSf-0001Kk-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:52:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzSe-0001Kg-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzIY-0006EQ-08; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:42:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7626.129221166623832 (code B ref 7626); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 03:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2010 03:41:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzHe-0006CJ-6T for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRzHZ-0006BY-5Q for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LDC00200KSSGP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7626@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:47:09 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.167.122]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LDC0013BL6KPAD0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 05:47:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 22:42:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42472 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: 7626@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:29:01 +0900 > > I'm now working on various bug-fixing and improvement of > rmail's mime handling, and fixing the above is included in > the work. Thank you. > The problem is that which coding system to set if the header and > each text part of multipart have different "charset". At the > moment, I'm going to commit a code that set the FIRST coding system > used for decoding some part (header, parts of multipart, forwarded > message, etc). That might be a good logic. The important thing here is to DTRT as much as possible wrt replying to the message: rmail-reply sets the buffer for composing the response to be encoded in the same encoding as the original message. So whatever you do in the Rmail buffer when you display the message should yield an encoding most probably suitable for the reply. TIA