From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: list-print-separator Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:55:57 +0300 Message-ID: <83aafe9pw2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762qr8x23.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcy7mbxq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87hb9nglen.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877haiebj9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o5mml36.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zknel3tt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8762q2s23e.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303754199 11207 80.91.229.12 (25 Apr 2011 17:56:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, thierry.volpiatto@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 25 19:56:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ1M-0008Ek-8L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:56:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47795 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ1L-00032l-R3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52644) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ1B-0002kB-8b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ1A-0000H8-DB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:55372) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QEQ1A-0000Go-5Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:56:16 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LK700600Z4Z8200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:55:54 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.133.26]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LK7005CQZ54KVA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:55:54 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138749 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 14:28:38 -0300 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> OK. I'll look at `pp' in my spare time :) > > I have noticed in the past that printing a whole object with pp is > > slower (much) than looping in this object and printing element by > > element. > > Yes, `pp's slowness (as is usually the case for most/all software > slowness problems) is algorithmic. Perhaps someone could try rewriting `pp' in Python, for the latest GDB releases. Maybe that could be faster. More generally, it would be nice to have Python versions of the .gdbinit commands we use.