From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:46:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83aa952mq3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fwix2osa.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318502943 7143 80.91.229.12 (13 Oct 2011 10:49:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: carstenmattner@googlemail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 13 12:48:59 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1REIqR-0008Ju-3f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:48:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REIqQ-0001b7-KJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REIqN-0001Tc-0f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:48:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REIqJ-0000kK-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:41179) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1REIqI-0000k3-P7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:48:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LT000E0037SZS00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:46:12 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.17.178]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LT000EZ938XFB60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:46:12 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145114 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Carsten Mattner , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:33:15 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I think mmap is always used if available and workable. > > No. > > use_mmap_for_buffers=no > case "$opsys" in > cygwin|freebsd|irix6-5) use_mmap_for_buffers=yes ;; > esac Thanks, I confused the OP's question with whether malloc uses mmap.