From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:18:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83a9mfjrt0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51C6B138.50903@gmx.at> <51C6CF57.9030203@alice.it> <51C87C3E.90904@gmx.at> <83ehbrju1d.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372097940 5939 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2013 18:19:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 24 20:18:59 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBLu-0003KM-8Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:18:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBLt-0004Vb-S1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43386) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBLq-0004Sy-8h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:18:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBLp-000896-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:18:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:65237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrBLo-00088v-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 14:18:52 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOW00I00THX4D00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:18:48 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOW00HENTJAYG60@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 21:18:46 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160963 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 19:52:37 +0200 > Cc: martin rudalics , Angelo Graziosi , > Emacs developers > > (After some effort, I suppose "respectively" distributes "parameters > not saved by c-w-c" to "left alone by s-w-c" and "or w-s-g" to "not > installed by w-s-p". If that is a common idiom in English, is not one > I've ever found, so my recommendation still stands.) It's something German-speaking people in particular tend to like, I have no idea why.