From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17497: 24.4.50; TTY menu glitches Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 19:46:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83a9a9n4lx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5374B271.50803@yandex.ru> <83zjijlz83.fsf@gnu.org> <8361l6m7md.fsf@gnu.org> <83egzsenkb.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppj6msta.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvk1n5vo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400777267 8436 80.91.229.3 (22 May 2014 16:47:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, 17497@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 22 18:47:39 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW9E-00047b-Qh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 18:47:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW9E-0002T8-3N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53721) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW96-0002SZ-FS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:47:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW91-0002fY-4t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:47:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57888) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW91-0002fR-2J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW90-0003Bb-CS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17497 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17497-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17497.140077719012193 (code B ref 17497); Thu, 22 May 2014 16:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17497) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 May 2014 16:46:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56765 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW8T-0003Aa-Nh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:51000) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WnW8R-0003A8-A1 for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 12:46:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N5Z00500IGH9G00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 17497@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 19:46:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N5Z004VVIL8MAB0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 22 May 2014 19:46:20 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89363 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, 17497@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 12:26:47 -0400 > > > If so, perhaps you could produce a termscript for the same sequence of > > keypresses, just at that "normal" speed, so we could compare them. (If > > one of the termscripts has fewer keypresses than the other, it doesn't > > matter, as long as you press the same keys.) > > You mean I can replace "lean on the down key, lean on the up key, lean > on the down key" with just "down, up, down"? Actually, something like 20 times down, then 20 times up would be better, I think. Also, if you revert revision 117033 on emacs-24 branch (or try with a binary built before Apr 29, if you keep them), does the problem still exist? TIA