From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC] Correctly handling MinGW-w64 Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:55:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83a93pddo9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3x2qyjg.fsf@wanadoo.es> <546973D0.7050306@cs.ucla.edu> <87ioieqxbb.fsf@wanadoo.es> <54697A45.1040505@cs.ucla.edu> <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416239784 13635 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 15:56:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:56:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 16:56:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOez-0005HN-QR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:56:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48572 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOez-0000b6-GF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:56:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOer-0000Zh-Ts for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:56:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOem-00045W-8p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:38044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqOem-00045S-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 10:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF600400WYEUC00@mtaout24.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:48:23 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF6002M1X8N9L30@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:48:23 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87egt1rhy4.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177427 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:59:47 +0100 >=20 > Paul Eggert writes: >=20 > > =C3=93scar Fuentes wrote: > >>> into ms-w32.h or into some other header specific to Microsoft W= indows? > >> We don't have a header that is included by all the .c files, rig= ht? > > > > Every .c file includes stdbool.h, string.h, and stdlib.h, via > > conf_post.h. If none of those serve, you can include whatever fi= le > > you like (stdio.h, say), in ms-w32.h or something like that. >=20 > Doing that is a kludge. At some point on the future someone will ch= ange > how some of those files are #included (or remove them altogether). Whatever happens, ms-w32.h will always be included in conf_post.h. > I thought that this type of tasks are the raison d'=C3=AAtre of `co= nfigure'. So did I. I'm confused and perplexed to hear arguments to the contrary. Didn't we toss the src/s/*.h files for this very reason?