From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19468: 25.0.50; UI inconveniences with M-. Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:43:03 +0200 Message-ID: <83a925ava0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <54A24079.4020902@yandex.ru> <54A2DCBC.6010406@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419961459 14544 80.91.229.3 (30 Dec 2014 17:44:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eller.helmut@gmail.com, 19468@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 30 18:44:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60q3-0007xy-Pq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:44:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60q3-00016D-7h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52440) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60pz-00015z-TI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60pu-0002R6-Rn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60pu-0002Qr-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60pu-0004Bg-Gi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19468 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19468-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19468.141996139716025 (code B ref 19468); Tue, 30 Dec 2014 17:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19468) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2014 17:43:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33043 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60pB-0004AP-2x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34328) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y60p8-0004AF-Sh for 19468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 12:43:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NHE00900P1CKB00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 19468@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:43:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NHE00991P81GE20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:43:13 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <54A2DCBC.6010406@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97852 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 19:11:24 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: Eli Zaretskii , 19468@debbugs.gnu.org, > Helmut Eller > > Suppose there are several "perfect" matches. Should the imperfect > matches be included in the list too, then? Find-tag, when called with an argument, would go through all the possible matches one by one, starting from the "perfect" one. So yes, I think it is good to present the list of all the candidates, it will be functionally equivalent to what find-tag did.