From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19993: 25.0.50; Unicode fonts defective on Windows Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:45:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8zqo15d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150303220228.GA28969@math.berkeley.edu> <83egp4prs3.fsf@gnu.org> <20150305220502.GA4096@math.berkeley.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425638788 13298 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2015 10:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 10:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ilya Zakharevich Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 06 11:46:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTplh-0006VY-Qj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 11:46:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57343 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTplh-0003jw-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:46:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTple-0003it-3n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTpla-0005vS-Pe for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:46:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTpla-0005vO-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTpla-0007NA-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19993.142563872228275 (code B ref 19993); Fri, 06 Mar 2015 10:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2015 10:45:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36870 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTpkv-0007Ly-Gw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:45:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:46311) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTpkt-0007Lj-Bj for 19993@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 05:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NKS00300DLBR000@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 19993@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:45:13 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NKS0032JDV0O530@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 12:45:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <20150305220502.GA4096@math.berkeley.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100148 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:05:02 -0800 > From: Ilya Zakharevich > Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org > > but only with some specialized encodings (instead of iso10646). How comes? > > Would not this explain why the glyph is not shown? What glyph? Once again, please provide examples someone else can work with. Also, it might help to understand how did you produce the font log, and in particular with what argument, if any, did you invoke font-show-log.