From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20628: 25.0.50; Incorrect line height for some fonts Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 12:31:12 +0300 Message-ID: <83a8wu1fvj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <555E9C2E.8040008@live.com> <83617l5aox.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp5s2a77.fsf@gmail.com> <83wq004x2w.fsf@gnu.org> <83twv44vd3.fsf@gnu.org> <87egm87ny6.fsf@gmail.com> <83oalc4syu.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k7m5u.fsf@gmail.com> <83mw0w4seb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zj4w66ds.fsf@gmail.com> <83lhgg4qhf.fsf@gnu.org> <87iobk64e6.fsf@gmail.com> <83h9r44o63.fsf@gnu.org> <87pp5sy4vu.fsf@gmail.com> <83egm84mj3.fsf@gnu.org> <87617k6127.fsf@gmail.com> <83d21s4lpx.fsf@gnu.org> <87twv44lnc.fsf@gmail.com> <83bnhc4gx4.fsf@gnu.org> <555F7D7C.8070503@live.com> <831ti84d8u.fsf@gnu.org> <555F90A1.9080001@live.com> <83iobj3gzb.fsf@gnu.org> <556189C6.5070103@live.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432459951 1726 80.91.229.3 (24 May 2015 09:32:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 09:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, 20628@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit--Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 24 11:32:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGa-0003Jk-81 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 11:32:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39447 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGZ-0002Z7-8R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:32:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGT-0002Ye-Cf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:32:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGJ-0005i7-Dk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGJ-0005hm-Bc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:32:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSGJ-0007OM-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:32:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 09:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20628 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20628-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20628.143245989128374 (code B ref 20628); Sun, 24 May 2015 09:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20628) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 May 2015 09:31:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54214 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSFj-0007NW-EW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43701) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YwSFd-0007NE-Ti for 20628@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 05:31:25 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NOU00L00KOET200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 20628@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 May 2015 12:31:15 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NOU00L2RL43UQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 24 May 2015 12:31:15 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <556189C6.5070103@live.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103125 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 04:20:22 -0400 > From: Clément Pit--Claudel > > CC: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, 20628@debbugs.gnu.org > > > How about setting the list of fonts to be ignored (assuming Emacs > > acquires such a capability) -- would that be useful for packages? > > Maybe. The problem is that if a good font is not installed yet, ignoring Latin Modern Math means replacing huge lines with square boxes. I'm not sure which one is best. Ignoring Latin Modern Math may be better because fixing the square boxes then only requires installing a new font (while fixing the line heights requires installing a new font /and/ setting up fontsets in Emacs). But ignoring Latin Modern Math is also more confusing (the symbols will display fine in user's web browsers, but not in Emacs). The unearthing of `face-ignored-fonts' likely makes this an easy change; do you have an opinion either way? I think it is better top ignore fonts that produce display which is unacceptable to users. You can include in the installation instructions advice on which fonts to install.