From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: string> missing? Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:57:25 +0300 Message-ID: <83a8wdnuai.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87oakxkvqw.fsf@petton.fr> <83zj4grgkc.fsf@gnu.org> <87sia8n8b5.fsf@petton.fr> <87zj4gu821.fsf@gnu.org> <83sia8rdkm.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5crbfd.fsf@gnu.org> <837frjqzpk.fsf@gnu.org> <83wpzinfhy.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433577478 19995 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2015 07:57:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 07:57:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, tsdh@gnu.org, nandryshak@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 06 09:57:49 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18zD-0005qB-Iv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:57:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50959 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18zC-0007YC-L1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18z1-0007Y6-0C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18yx-0004H9-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:37483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z18yx-0004H5-J0; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPI00500IXV4800@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:53:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NPI002SZJ8VCR30@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 10:53:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:187060 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 21:52:46 -0400 > Cc: nicolas@petton.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, nandryshak@gmail.com, tsdh@gnu.org > > > > Adding string> might be 200 bytes. Saving 200 bytes is insignificant. > > > It was also insignificant back when you decided not to include it. > > With all due respect, I don't think you are in a position to judge. I'm just saying something that seemed to be a non-brainer. If 200 bytes were significant back then, perhaps you could elaborate on why and how it could be significant. Then we all will be on the same page. TIA