From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21885: 24.5; Transposing things with a negative argument Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:17:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8qjhyks.fsf@gnu.org> References: <22084.18903.339422.795322@lambda.ccs.neu.edu> <83ziyji42y.fsf@gnu.org> <5644D3C3.1020705@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447352308 13565 80.91.229.3 (12 Nov 2015 18:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eli@barzilay.org, 21885@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 12 19:18:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRr-0008SO-Hw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:18:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48933 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRq-00041T-T7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:18:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRk-0003uo-6P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRf-0000CO-Ip for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44293) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRf-0000CF-Gk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRf-0003LP-5d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:18:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:18:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21885 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21885-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21885.144735226012813 (code B ref 21885); Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:18:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21885) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Nov 2015 18:17:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35000 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRH-0003Kb-Go for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:33103) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwwRF-0003KS-TT for 21885@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:17:38 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXP00E00RNZBD00@mtaout25.012.net.il> for 21885@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:15:11 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXP009V5S1BFI50@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Thu, 12 Nov 2015 20:15:11 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5644D3C3.1020705@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:108659 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 19:00:35 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 21885@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Could you please describe in more detail what do you see vs what you > > expected? I'm not sure I understand the problem; in particular, I do > > see point "after the transposed thing", but maybe I don't understand > > what you meant by that. > > Bug#20698? Looks like that, thanks.