From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The future of Follow Mode - a proposal. Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:14:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8mqhvym.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160218195630.GA2697@acm.fritz.box> <837fi1u5qt.fsf@gnu.org> <20160219142522.GA3193@acm.fritz.box> <83povsr8cc.fsf@gnu.org> <20160219181834.GC3193@acm.fritz.box> <83io1kr12k.fsf@gnu.org> <20160220124415.GA1758@acm.fritz.box> <83wppzo7lf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160223231156.GA26899@acm.fritz.box> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456334102 4870 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 17:15:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 18:15:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd1e-0004bs-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:14:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd1e-00017j-9a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54859) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd1E-00013O-7A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd1A-0002lL-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd1A-0002lH-SL; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:28 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3724 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aYd19-0002mU-HB; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 12:14:28 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:57:41 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200626 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 22:57:41 -0500 > > As mentioned last time this follow-mode discussion came up, I think > a better approach (maybe not easier, but more generally useful) would be > to add an Elisp hook that can control the order in which > windows are redisplayed. But that's orthogonal to the issues described by Alan, right?