From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: When should ralloc.c be used? (WAS: bug#24358) Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:20:49 +0300 Message-ID: <83a8drur7i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87twe6sx2g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87eg51ng4r.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <87k2djwumn.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83h98nidvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eg3rvtsf.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83k2dihpm9.fsf@gnu.org> <8760p2wzgj.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <838ttyhhzu.fsf@gnu.org> <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <83d1iq5ib1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3753c8j.fsf@gnu.org> <83r374wh32.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2cvuyc1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477491979 23827 195.159.176.226 (26 Oct 2016 14:26:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 16:26:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP9D-000247-Ts for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:25:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP9G-00015H-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:25:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP4d-0006ll-V1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP4Z-000170-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:20:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36192) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP4Z-00016n-6b; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2434 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bzP4R-00031q-Rd; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:20:48 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:10:35 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208842 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:10:35 -0400 > Cc: Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, Emacs developers > > Wouldn't configuring with REL_ALLOC=no work? It could, yes.