From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:06:33 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8blziva.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871szqwu51.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <831szqhbc2.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1itt79z.fsf_-_@users.sourceforge.net> <7baa18d4-2b09-caa8-005e-29008a383ad1@cs.ucla.edu> <83mvhwrgd5.fsf@gnu.org> <8539f38f-9a11-44c3-4de7-bb974c96206c@cs.ucla.edu> <8360ojpndr.fsf@gnu.org> <83shrnm0k1.fsf@gnu.org> <075B0922-F07A-4FBA-AE71-027E964A5ED4@raeburn.org> <54AAC13A-CF56-4393-A932-DC6CBBF51259@raeburn.org> <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <83pokyeale.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482577664 30649 195.159.176.226 (24 Dec 2016 11:07:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:07:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 24 12:07:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkAs-0007DH-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:07:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43020 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkAx-0007lA-3m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:07:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40751) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkAE-0007ks-7C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:06:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkA9-0004RX-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:06:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47694) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkA9-0004RR-Om; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:06:53 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3664 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cKkA8-0003kS-Vb; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:06:53 -0500 In-reply-to: <83pokyeale.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:42:21 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210779 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 17:42:21 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > From: Ken Raeburn > > Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 08:34:01 -0500 > > > > I’ve pushed an update to the scratch/raeburn-startup branch. It includes several updates: > > Thank you for your work, I will definitely try to check it out soon. I took a quick look. There are a few issues with the Windows build there, but I have one question to which I'd like to know the answer first: why do we still dumping temacs to emacs, instead of loading dumped.elc into a bare emacs?