From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 15:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8atbxl9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3CC6BB36-1794-4202-8243-132E0345B236@raeburn.org> <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg05c32y.fsf@gnu.org> <87inphx29r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484399180 15060 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 13:06:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 14:06:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1r-0001QV-Ev for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 14:05:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47954 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1q-00013s-QU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50683) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1k-00013c-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1h-0007Tl-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1h-0007TU-2D; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4982 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cSO1g-0007XH-48; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 08:05:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <87inphx29r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:19:12 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211278 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:19:12 +0100 > Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> > The line number in the error message is bogus, it points to a require > >> > line (that's a known issue with byte-compiler error reporting, I > >> > think). > >> > >> It's not bogus, since the error was raised while the byte-compiler > >> evaluated the form there. > > > > It's "bogus" in the sense that it isn't useful for finding the code > > which triggered the error. > > It is as bogus as every Lisp error. On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the error locus. This one clearly didn't.