From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 64-bit build on Windows Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 21:52:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83a8ak5gx4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874m0tc0gn.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87efzxn6or.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y3y5681f.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485028444 29169 195.159.176.226 (21 Jan 2017 19:54:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 21 20:53:58 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1jE-0005Or-6I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 20:53:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33146 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1jJ-0002fX-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48845) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1im-0002fH-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1ii-0008Ey-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:53:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34426) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1ii-0008Eu-SL; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:53:04 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3326 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cV1ih-0004T4-Id; Sat, 21 Jan 2017 14:53:04 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Juanma Barranquero on Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:57:01 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211485 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2017 19:57:01 +0100 > Cc: Óscar Fuentes , > Emacs developers > > But I am now worried about nt/INSTALL.W64, which is directed to those who want to build the 64-bit port > anew, from scratch (from the repository or a source tarball). Following that file's steps, Imagemagick is not > installed. I think that anyone knowledgeable enough to install Imagemagick and try to build with it will know to > use --without-imagemagick if needed. So, I think the following minimal patch best reflects the current > experience: Fine with me, but please wait for a few days to give MinGW64 users a chance to comment on this. Thanks.