From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 17:31:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83a81tjt0l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1017454172.910810.1504618695244@mail.libero.it> <83mv66z66p.fsf@gnu.org> <102a4c21-c275-c73e-ec53-0d85975dc968@cs.ucla.edu> <83a825znuf.fsf@gnu.org> <831snhzkgw.fsf@gnu.org> <837ex9x7vf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw0cwcle.fsf@gnu.org> <83h8wcw3td.fsf@gnu.org> <83377vx3d0.fsf@gnu.org> <83ingnq01t.fsf@gnu.org> <83fubrpxsv.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2v9masw.fsf@gnu.org> <83d16smj5o.fsf@gnu.org> <83wp50koo3.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505658758 1815 195.159.176.226 (17 Sep 2017 14:32:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 14:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, fabrice.popineau@centralesupelec.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 17 16:32:32 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtaca-0000GW-GN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 16:32:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60820 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtach-0006cX-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:32:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtabr-0006ZH-Sf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:31:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtabo-0000O0-2i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:31:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtabn-0000Nw-VF; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3240 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dtabn-000695-FK; Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:31:43 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Copley on Sun, 17 Sep 2017 08:14:41 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218405 Archived-At: > From: Richard Copley > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 08:14:41 +0100 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Fabrice Popineau , > Emacs Development > > > Perhaps we should insist on something newer than GCC 5.3 before enabling > > warnings by default, as there is a point of diminishing returns here. > > The warning was from GCC 7.2.0. Indeed. GCC 5 and 6 don't emit this warning in those places (or maybe this warning is only supported starting with GCC 7?).