From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs26: Quick thoughts on display-line-numbers-mode Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 09:48:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83a814wz3w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1507229521.6891.6.camel@gmail.com> <83fuaxwgql.fsf@gnu.org> <1507232129.15251.12.camel@gmail.com> <83efqhwezk.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuaxxjog.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507272570 969 195.159.176.226 (6 Oct 2017 06:49:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 06:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: maplant95@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alex Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 06 08:49:22 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MRl-0007VN-Fa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:49:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43255 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MRq-000519-Td for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:49:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MRD-00050k-NP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:48:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MRA-0002W9-M7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36757) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MRA-0002Vu-IB; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4004 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e0MR9-0003uK-VD; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 02:48:44 -0400 In-reply-to: <87fuaxxjog.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex on Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:24:15 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219163 Archived-At: > From: Alex > Cc: Matthew Plant , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 17:24:15 -0600 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> That being said, shouldn't this face be part of the group display-line- > >> number? Faces for compilation errors are part of the the compilation > >> group. > > > > My reasoning was that this is one of the basic faces we provide, so > > it's in the basic faces group. > > It appears that a face can be added to multiple groups. Which other faces are in more than one group? > Perhaps this should be done for the line-number* faces? If this is established practice, no objections here.