From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master b88e7c8: Make transpose-regions interactive (Bug#30343) Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 18:59:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7uug75g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180311105533.30002.78782@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180311105534.3DAFD23CF3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83woyiscns.fsf@gnu.org> <87po44jb7w.fsf@red-bean.com> <20180311105533.30002.78782@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180311105534.3DAFD23CF3@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83woyiscns.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7v2zb27.fsf@red-bean.com> <838tallwpg.fsf@gnu.org> <83605kgo1w.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522079863 9737 195.159.176.226 (26 Mar 2018 15:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 15:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 26 17:57:39 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UV8-0002SY-S9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 17:57:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57582 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UXC-0007rD-Dz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:59:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UWV-0007Pe-AP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:59:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UWS-00079J-7x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:46628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UWS-00079F-4V; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:59:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2949 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f0UWR-0005VW-DB; Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:58:59 -0400 In-reply-to: (charles@aurox.ch) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:224043 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2018 22:29:29 +0200 > From: charles@aurox.ch (Charles A. Roelli) > CC: kfogel@red-bean.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > I searched for "override functions" and "override primitives" in the > > > index, but did not find a result. > > > > I would index this as "redefining functions", at least in addition to > > "overriding", if not instead of it. > > I think both are good, although an index entry for "overriding > functions" could also point to the "advice" documentation, since > "overriding" is a less precise term than "redefining". Done.