From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Message's text-properties in *Messages* (was: edebug: regrettable loss of information in Emacs 26.1 when printing a variable's value) Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 20:22:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7sqcmnw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20180521171019.GA5750@ACM> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527096023 4209 195.159.176.226 (23 May 2018 17:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 17:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 23 19:20:18 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXQv-0000nz-DB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 19:20:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34700 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXSv-0001vB-P2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38491) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXSi-0001u7-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXSd-0000dl-A7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:22:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45565) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXSd-0000dV-7Y; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:22:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2570 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fLXSc-0004fG-Mk; Wed, 23 May 2018 13:22:03 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 23 May 2018 12:03:45 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225615 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 23 May 2018 12:03:45 -0400 > > - Why would arbitrary Lisp code be dangerous (I understand that message_dolog > can be called from within redisplay, but redisplay runs Elisp code > at several places, so "from redidplay" doesn't inherently imply you > can't run Elisp code). When Lisp code is called from redisplay, we always do that via safe_call. Anything else is not safe, AFAIR.