From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34263: 26.1; documentation for kmacro-insert-counter C-u is wrong Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:36:48 +0200 Message-ID: <83a7jfy0z3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83o97wzwd2.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgx7ygk6.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="245751"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34263-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: darkfeline@felesatra.moe Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 16:38:20 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatY-0011p9-Jh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:38:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatU-0006xL-Iv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:38:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatH-0006vl-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:38:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatG-0006VA-RD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:38:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55865) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatG-0006Ut-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gpatG-0002uQ-9d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:38:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 15:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 34263 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 34263@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, darkfeline@felesatra.moe Original-Received: via spool by 34263-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34263.154903543111115 (code D ref 34263); Fri, 01 Feb 2019 15:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34263-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2019 15:37:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55145 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gpasR-0002tD-H3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37373) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gpasP-0002sz-8q for 34263-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gpasG-0005tX-OJ; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:37:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1918 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gpasF-0001R9-Vl; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 10:37:00 -0500 In-reply-to: <83sgx7ygk6.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:00:09 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154981 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:00:09 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 34263@debbugs.gnu.org > > How do you suggest to define "previous" to avoid the confusion? That > was the reason for bug#31243. We must add to the documentation the > definition of "previous" that would be clear and unequivocal. Never mind, I think I found a good way of explaining what is the "previous" counter value, and fixed the docs accordingly. Take a look at the emacs-26 branch. Thanks.