From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34655: 26.1.92; Segfault in module with --module-assertions Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:27:30 +0200 Message-ID: <83a7iimuxp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874l8r1t3a.fsf@tcd.ie> <87h8cqre8n.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="223777"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34655@debbugs.gnu.org, rms@gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 16:28:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeP-000w8X-8L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 16:28:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57210 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeO-0004Ba-9g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeI-0004BE-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeH-0005zy-Vl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39656) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeH-0005zP-Pn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyeeH-0006bY-K0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34655 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34655-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34655.155119485025348 (code B ref 34655); Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34655) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2019 15:27:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53200 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyedm-0006al-Ah for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:27:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56974) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gyedk-0006aY-Ta for 34655@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gyede-0005kq-Hf; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:27:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3932 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gyedX-0004Nv-KF; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:27:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <87h8cqre8n.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155812 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:16:56 +0000 > Cc: 34655@debbugs.gnu.org > > The reason I submitted this bug report is because I don't know whether > the switch --module-assertions has unveiled an issue in my module or > Emacs' module implementation. So without using --module-assertions the crash doesn't happen, is that what you are saying?