From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35659: 26.1; Weird horizontal scroll behavior with certain settings for `auto-hscroll-mode' and `hscroll-step`. Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 17:03:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7fufltw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ef56fong.fsf@gnu.org> <83bm0afn6w.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="56286"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 35659@debbugs.gnu.org To: Clemens Radermacher Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 16:10:42 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6ER-000EVA-Ob for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 16:10:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP6EQ-0006g8-JN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP691-00021f-NZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP690-0004JI-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:05:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53380) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP690-0004IR-NV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP690-0000v2-C5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:05:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 14:05:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35659 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 35659-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35659.15574970543473 (code B ref 35659); Fri, 10 May 2019 14:05:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 May 2019 14:04:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38691 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP68D-0000tx-Oy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54864) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hP68A-0000ti-O2 for 35659@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46325) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hP685-0003a1-Ky; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4081 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hP682-000264-Ek; Fri, 10 May 2019 10:04:05 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Clemens Radermacher on Fri, 10 May 2019 15:44:01 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159046 Archived-At: > Cc: 35659@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clemens Radermacher > Date: Fri, 10 May 2019 15:44:01 +0200 > > Still I think when the shorter lines don't get pushed around > with hscroll-step 0, it shouldn't happen with hscroll-step set to another value. I think the fact that it happens for hscroll-step of zero is "by sheer luck". I certainly don't remember explicitly coding that. > Thank you for doing it, it's really a great feature and I like it. I guess > I have to live with the default setting for hscroll-step then. Maybe someone will find an easy fix, volunteers are welcome. Emacs really shouldn't depend for its display code development on one old curmudgeon such as myself...