From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20675: 24.3; emacsclient cannot talk to emacs Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 18:29:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83a7aj88u8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831rvw9uo5.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9t88ekd.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="151794"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 20675@debbugs.gnu.org, bruce.korb@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 02 17:30:39 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgaM-000dLI-7K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 17:30:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56648 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgaL-0000VE-3h for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:30:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZp-0000GJ-FT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:30:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZn-00045e-LH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57600) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZm-00044N-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZm-0000hK-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20675 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 20675-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20675.15700301692618 (code B ref 20675); Wed, 02 Oct 2019 15:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20675) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2019 15:29:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38188 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZF-0000gA-Am for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:29:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40770) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZD-0000fw-KM for 20675@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZ8-0003vb-7W; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:29:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3082 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iFgZ7-0007UN-Ff; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:29:21 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:37:15 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:168162 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:37:15 +0200 > Cc: Bruce Korb , 20675@debbugs.gnu.org > > > I actually don't understand why do we have this text in the FAQ. The > > user manual documents this facility clearly enough (AFAIK), so the > > most the FAQ should do is point to the manual. Or maybe this whole > > question should be deleted from the FAQ. > > For now, maybe it's enough to just remove the details on > server-socket-dir from the FAQ, and add a reference to the manual > where users can find the documentation on server-name. Patch > attached; WDYT? Fine with me, thanks.