From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38485: Customizing glyph widths Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 17:19:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83a786iyvc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3183ba6c-6aea-fa25-bb32-7e5ff7c04ad6@gmail.com> <83y2vshyvn.fsf@gnu.org> <478afae1-0080-c825-5a53-1bc8e897a1cc@gmail.com> <83sgm0hvhx.fsf@gnu.org> <4e6c87d3-21c0-1820-96f2-62bb0dd7c925@gmail.com> <83r21khquw.fsf@gnu.org> <32a6f122-f21a-4522-21d6-0ae0a17b6bee@gmail.com> <83o8wnigy5.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="147016"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: casouri@gmail.com, 38485@debbugs.gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 05 16:20:26 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1icsva-000c7l-3H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 16:20:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56100 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icsvY-0008FT-TT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:20:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1icsvD-0008DD-FB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:20:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icsvC-0004VE-BI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icsvC-0004UN-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icsvC-0001C7-12 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:20:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38485 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38485-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38485.15755591704542 (code B ref 38485); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:20:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38485) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2019 15:19:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45031 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icsuf-0001BC-Ng for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:19:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:34890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1icsud-0001Ay-U1 for 38485@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:19:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41243) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1icsuY-00028p-Np; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4488 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1icsuX-0001EH-Iv; Thu, 05 Dec 2019 10:19:22 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Pit-Claudel on Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:26:12 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:172915 Archived-At: > Cc: casouri@gmail.com, 38485@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Clément Pit-Claudel > Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 09:26:12 -0500 > > > Are you saying that we _can_ not widen them, or are you saying that we > > _must_not_ widen them? If the latter, can you explain why not? > > That we must not. I set up these prettifications specifically to make the characters narrower and reduce visual clutter; widening them would defeat that purpose. So in this case the alignment considerations are thrown out the window? > I commonly write things like this: > > Lemma lcomm: forall x y, x ~+~ y <-> y ~+~ x. > Proof. induction x; cbn; try rewrite IHx; reflexivity. Defined. > > with prettification, it looks like this: > > Lemma lcomm: ∀ x y, x ⨤ y ↔ y ⨤ x. > ∵. induction x; cbn; try rewrite IHx; reflexivity. □. > > What I really want is this: > > Lemma lcomm: ∀ x y, x ⨤ y ↔ y ⨤ x. > ∵. induction x; cbn; try rewrite IHx; reflexivity. □. > > but not this: > > Lemma lcomm: ∀ x y, x ⨤ y ↔ y ⨤ x. > ∵ . induction x; cbn; try rewrite IHx; reflexivity. □ . Why is "Proof" treated differently from the other symbols? How would the user know which one is which?