From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 3fc859d: Go back to iso-2022-7bit for titdic-cnv.el again Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:26:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83a770e902.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200105203051.21185.19313@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200105203053.36B932105B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83mub0ecnk.fsf@gnu.org> <87r20c78to.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="112918"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 20:07:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ioXjF-000TFs-7B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 20:07:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58428 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioXjD-00085T-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 14:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ioX5R-0004KM-Jo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:26:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59929) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ioX5Q-0005Vr-MA; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:26:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2218 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ioX5Q-0007wk-2F; Mon, 06 Jan 2020 13:26:44 -0500 In-reply-to: <87r20c78to.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Mon, 06 Jan 2020 19:12:35 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:244042 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 19:12:35 +0100 > > On Jan 06 2020, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > > Agreed. My point was mostly that reverting the encoding to iso-2022 is > > probably not the best course of action and that other than "uselessly > > complex code" I couldn't find a concrete problem description that can > > help decide whether the charset properties are actually relevant. > > In the compiled file, the strings lose their charset property, thus the > reencoding into iso-2022-7bit was a no-op. Indeed. My idea was to have the call to propertize in the generated input method. But again, I'm not yet sure this is worth the hassle.