From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41357: 28.0.50; GC may miss to mark calle safe register content Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 20:22:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83a726bhn1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pnb2bmk2.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeribiim.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="40212"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41357@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 17 19:24:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN1M-000ANQ-Cg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 19:24:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51738 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN1L-00052r-D1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN19-000518-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33107) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN18-0005Uh-2W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN17-0007Kb-V3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:24:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 17:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.158973619128115 (code B ref -1); Sun, 17 May 2020 17:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2020 17:23:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN0J-0007JP-0v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:23:11 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:49826) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN0G-0007JH-SH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:23:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN0G-0004Yr-Mg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN0G-0005Nk-AC; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2056 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jaN0E-0003ba-Fg; Sun, 17 May 2020 13:23:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Andrea Corallo on Sun, 17 May 2020 17:13:26 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180493 Archived-At: > From: Andrea Corallo > Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu > Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 17:13:26 +0000 > > If a C function caller of 'flush_stack_call_func' allocates a > Lisp_Object in a temp variable and the compiler decide to keep this in a > callee saved reg while 'flush_stack_call_func' is called this will be > garbage collected unexpectedly. Can you show me an example of this (as skeleton C code)? Thanks.