From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43389: 28.0.50; Emacs memory leaks Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 23:10:19 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6vfr8p0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ft57raog.fsf@gnu.org> <871rgrk9g5.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <83d00br9xk.fsf@gnu.org> <87tutnitta.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23984"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: carlos@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org, dj@redhat.com To: Florian Weimer Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 17 22:11:09 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8Fo-000665-FG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:11:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59380 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8Fn-0002hx-Hb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:11:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8Fi-0002hh-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8Fi-0007p8-9r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8Fi-000088-4l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:11:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43389.1605647431463 (code B ref 43389); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Nov 2020 21:10:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33131 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8FD-00007P-Hx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:10:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59050) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8FC-00007D-B0 for 43389@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8F6-0007XT-A6; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1893 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kf8F5-0002bu-NB; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:10:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tutnitta.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> (message from Florian Weimer on Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:58:57 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193587 Archived-At: > From: Florian Weimer > Cc: dj@redhat.com, carlos@redhat.com, 43389@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:58:57 +0100 > > (let ((size 0)) > (dolist (buffer (buffer-list) size) > (setq size (+ size (buffer-size buffer))))) > ⇒ 98249826 > > So it's not a small number, but still far away from those 800 MiB. Yes. I have a very similar value: 94642916 (in 376 buffers; you have more than 1000). This is in a session that runs for 17 days and whose VM size is 615 MB: a "normal" size for a long-living session, nowhere near 2GB, let alone 11GB someone reported.