From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45264: 26.3; `face-remap-set-base' seems to be bugged Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:58:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83a6u9tyh1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <> <<833602umgb.fsf@gnu.org>> <4efb5c63-6636-449f-8e2b-4b8533a9cc8c@default> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7036"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45264-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 19 19:59:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhS7-0001kR-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 19:59:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60866 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhS6-0007Jc-6Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhRW-0007HZ-MU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhRW-0005N8-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:59:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhRW-00026y-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:59:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 45264 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 45264@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 45264-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D45264.16084043178075 (code D ref 45264); Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45264-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2020 18:58:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43162 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhR6-00026B-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:58:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42292) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhR3-00025q-Uf for 45264-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:58:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:59794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhQy-0005KL-4X; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:58:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3102 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kqhQr-0001DA-SU; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:58:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4efb5c63-6636-449f-8e2b-4b8533a9cc8c@default> (message from Drew Adams on Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:32:16 -0800 (PST)) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196416 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 10:32:16 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 45264@debbugs.gnu.org > > The confusion is from the doc not saying explicitly > that each element of SPECS is a face spec, and NOT a > face. SPECS has no "elements". SPECS stands for arguments to the function beyond the 1st arg FACE. Each such argument is either a face name or a list of attribute/value pairs. I changed the doc string to be more clear about that. > 2. "why you thought the argument could be a list of > one or more faces?" > > The doc string explicitly says that elements of > SPECS can be face names: > > Each list element should be either a face name or... That's after it says that you should consider SPECS as "forming" a list of elements.