From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#38181: Actual height of mode-line not taken into account Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 13:40:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6jak1vh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeyd3ul0.fsf@bernoul.li> <83czo6k9p1.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28944"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 38181@debbugs.gnu.org To: Carlos Pita Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 15 12:41:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKeH-0007Jk-DV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:41:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37466 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKeF-0008A0-3N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKe6-00086F-OS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKe6-00029h-Di for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKe6-0007Yu-72 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 38181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 38181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B38181.163429446029051 (code B ref 38181); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 10:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 38181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2021 10:41:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38262 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKe3-0007YV-Uz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:41:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKe2-0007YG-55 for 38181@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41040) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKdt-000201-UK; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:40:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4162 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mbKdA-000839-5g; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 06:40:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Carlos Pita on Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:00:19 -0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:217307 Archived-At: > From: Carlos Pita > Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 05:00:19 -0300 > Cc: 38181@debbugs.gnu.org > > I don't know if it will help you dealing with the problem, but I > believe that what I've just answered to Martin is new, indeed the > workaround that was working before carefully deactivated itself after > the first forced redisplay. What I can't see is why after the first > redisplay, if the modeline hasn't changed, the popup will be chopped > like that (a fortiori considering that previously it was correctly > laid out). Does the recipe involve any change in the appearance of the mode line? If not, then it's a separate issue.