From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] posix_spawn blocks SIGCHLD in spawned processes Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:07:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83a6chuke0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7CFD5E28-8266-4004-BF66-255146D72722@gnu.org> <83r18whunp.fsf@gnu.org> <36bbd45c-0a87-13b7-1589-afe943329e20@fastmail.com> <83ee4whqpf.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8y33hu1.fsf@rfc20.org> <83sft7aqxd.fsf@gnu.org> <3db6c69c-0c08-3f92-491b-0b715b18eb40@fastmail.com> <87pmo6c3h6.fsf@gmail.com> <86o82mvybj.fsf@hoetzel.info> <87zgm6ghdz.fsf@gmail.com> <864k4dvhr6.fsf@hoetzel.info> <87ee1tb0oc.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35003"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: alan@idiocy.org, juergen@hoetzel.info, emacs-devel@gnu.org, sauliusmenkevicius@fastmail.com, p.stephani2@gmail.com, matt@rfc20.org, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 19 18:09:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ngqPz-0008tT-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:09:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44812 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngqPx-0007Az-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:09:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngqOJ-0005l3-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngqOI-0003Kq-03; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:07:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=5lpxNTPG12NgX02TxepIxClW+wx+0E+Dqu7SnuNnIJE=; b=Q1aO3Md8CZbn1m27y6lE AQWYT65efq9LUTBxEk26pm8iBkrkXDmrg4+ZlHeHr4f0WZg0tCB8UPqjO6sFhN3obPlSQWkhyiQY+ FI6vzHYxUyON1/QWA6PHh3kyt5/bx3VtWcj6IXuDNgF8N2za66dH150G1JFCdY3j/z1SE19iT/Rl7 Ix3hCgmoR37fza/shdzHztj6KQK6yBsXVuHJOZiFE4X+PscDwjono9p/FWyp6jbLRvsMViw4c8AB7 hqAq4J5irk6yhoUQ3oTzC2mUVXhtrM3UNgWWjyWanF5JdRxeCx+SwIjmStoiKqI5o1/eTKOfldEEt L6sGiBNtWlkbhA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3345 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ngqOH-0006K3-GJ; Tue, 19 Apr 2022 12:07:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ee1tb0oc.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:36:03 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288674 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes > Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:36:03 +0200 > Cc: Alan Third , > Jürgen Hötzel , > emacs-devel@gnu.org, Saulius Menkevicius , > Matt Armstrong , Eli Zaretskii , > YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu > > >>>>> On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 20:22:13 +0200, Philipp Stephani said: > > Philipp> If not already done, would you mind installing this example as a new > Philipp> regression test? This area seems subtle enough that we'd benefit from > Philipp> testing the behavior explicitly. > > I donʼt think our test suite has support for compiling C programs > (Emacs C modules yes, but not standalone programs). You could perhaps use Emacs as such a "C program"?