From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Willing to debug bug #3542 (23.0.94; File access via UNC path slow again under Windows) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:01:19 +0300 Message-ID: <838wj11sz4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7dbe73ed0907051401o26903ca3t9a67060f3a3417ad@mail.gmail.com> <83fxda1pef.fsf@gnu.org> <7dbe73ed0907060038w53699f77ie742996955ae8118@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246910529 31941 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2009 20:02:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 20:02:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Mathias Dahl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 06 22:02:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MNuNs-0001L9-2w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:01:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNuNr-00032T-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:01:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNuNO-0002tb-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:01:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNuNN-0002t7-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:01:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59714 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNuNN-0002sv-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il ([84.95.2.4]:18365) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MNuNM-0002ci-Fw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout2.012.net.il by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KMD00J00M5FCS00@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:01:19 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.249.41]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KMD009J2MA6JED0@i_mtaout2.012.net.il>; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:01:19 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <7dbe73ed0907060038w53699f77ie742996955ae8118@mail.gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112100 Archived-At: > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:38:07 +0200 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > //gbgfs1/archive75 is a share that contains 260 directories and three > files. The server is located in our office. > > C-x d //gbgfs1/archive75 RET > > Emacs 22.1.1: 1 s > Emacs 23.0.95.1: 95 s > > So, that is about 95 times slower... Ouch! I'm quite sure I would have noticed such a terrible slowdown. Let me time similar commands tomorrow in my office. > Any tests in particular you want me to run? Not yet. But perhaps install StraceNT (http://stracent.en.softonic.com/) and see what are the differences between Emacs 22 and Emacs 23. Maybe you will even be able to see the system call(s) that take most of this extra time. TIA