From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5833: 23.1.94; Opening files on network shares on w32 is slow Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:40 +0300 Message-ID: <838w92yt7f.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8339zb21w3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270472327 13830 80.91.229.12 (5 Apr 2010 12:58:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:58:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mathias Dahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 05 14:58:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nylt3-0004KZ-EL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 14:58:41 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40580 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nylt2-0002tZ-Hh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NylqT-0002Hf-UG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49065 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NylqS-0002HL-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:56:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylqR-0008Sh-8Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:56:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52344) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylqR-0008Sd-4o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:55:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylWA-0007tD-7h; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5833 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5833-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5833.127047086130316 (code B ref 5833); Mon, 05 Apr 2010 12:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5833) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Apr 2010 12:34:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylVU-0007sv-Tm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:34:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NylVS-0007sq-Ud for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L0E00C00KVSSA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 5833@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.92.42]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L0E0072FLJX4ZG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 05 Apr 2010 15:33:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:35:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:35945 Archived-At: > From: Mathias Dahl > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 13:35:44 +0200 > Cc: 5833@debbugs.gnu.org > > Just now I tested this scenario in the latest pretest: I opened (from > Dired) a file only 800 bytes in size. It took 7 seconds. I then opened > another file, over 100 000 bytes and that also took 7 seconds. Opening > the larger of the files in Notepad takes just above a second. 7 seconds is an eternity for such small files. Btw, is "C-x C-f" faster than Dired, by any chance? > If there are any other tests I can do, please let me know. Can you tell if setting the following variables has any effect? (setq vc-handled-backends nil) (setq locate-dominating-stop-dir-regexp "") (Please try them one by one, in that order.)