From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Compositions and bidi display Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:12:57 +0300 Message-ID: <838w87x87a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3A521851-F7CC-45DB-A2ED-8348EF96D5CF@Freenet.DE> <83fx2q5w86.fsf@gnu.org> <834oj22e96.fsf@gnu.org> <837hnuys42.fsf@gnu.org> <83mxwoxo1t.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3xjxys1.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272510861 11467 80.91.229.12 (29 Apr 2010 03:14:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 05:14:19 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7KCc-0003qe-3z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:14:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47464 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7KCa-00070g-QE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:14:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O7KCW-00070A-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42953 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O7KCV-0006zS-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:14:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7KCT-0000UK-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:63838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O7KCT-0000U2-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:14:05 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L1M00900BILJK00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:12:58 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.125.239]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L1M006R9BLLL0B0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:12:58 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124315 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:49:39 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa > > > Btw, do we still need to support static compositions? Those are based > > on the `composition' text property, which are no longer supported, > > right? Or am I confused? > > They're not? I deduced this from the fact that we removed Qcomposition and the associated handle_composition_prop from xdisp.c. Again, I could be confused.