From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lisp/gnus/.dir-locals.el Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:57 +0200 Message-ID: <838w354f7i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83aanyhrnz.fsf@gnu.org> <5n1v95koyt.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837hiq5dh4.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp814l5x.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284406031 6768 80.91.229.12 (13 Sep 2010 19:27:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:27:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 13 21:27:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEgE-0000CN-9H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:27:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43900 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvEgD-0004UU-MM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58070 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OvEg7-0004UN-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEg6-0007qE-Pp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:26:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:36221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OvEg6-0007oc-JG; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 15:26:58 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L8P00H00A0IO100@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:57 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.81.53]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L8P00HHLA0WBFA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:26:57 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130089 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 20:54:09 +0200 > Cc: Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 19:18, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > So Juanma's question is still valid: how does the Unix build avoid > > compiling gnus/.dir-locals.el? > > I think Glenn just said it: apparently, on Unix it does not compile dotfiles. How does it do that? Ignoring dotfiles on Unix is not magic nor OS-level trick: an application, such as `ls', must actively omit them from processing. Where are they omitted during bootstrap's byte compilation?