From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10539: 24.0.92; low display-time-interval makes Emacs slow Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:28:53 +0200 Message-ID: <838vkry3ju.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zkdl93r0.fsf@web.de> <6162fwu92z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83y5ssxlrx.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327782688 28247 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2012 20:31:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 28 21:31:25 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEvk-0002oo-RI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:31:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53909 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEvk-0002GD-2a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEve-0002F7-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEvd-0005by-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:18 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43180) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEvd-0005bs-Mz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEwM-000554-7C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:32:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:32:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10539 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10539-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10539.132778271419514 (code B ref 10539); Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:32:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10539) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2012 20:31:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48567 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEwE-00054h-7L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48819) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RrEw8-00054M-AH for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 15:31:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LYI00M00ZMZB100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 10539@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:30:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.102.195]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LYI00MK8ZNI2B50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:30:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56146 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 10539@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:42:18 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Would the following wording make it less confusing/contradictory? > > > > Force next redisplay cycle to update the current buffer's mode line > > and header line, based on the latest values of all the relevant > > variables. > > Yes thanks. Plus something similar for the function's doc-string. Will do. > So it doesn't actually "force redisplay", it just marks things to be > updated the next time redisplay happens to occur (?). Yes, exactly.