From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:27:39 +0200 Message-ID: <838uwcbddg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5a4902b7-cb15-4088-9307-dcf1fb3008b7@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385400491 31538 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2013 17:28:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 25 18:28:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzxH-00082T-84 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:28:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkzxG-0007f9-Qz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:28:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52271) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzx9-0007ZC-9F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:28:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzx4-00042u-Du for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59044) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzx4-00042p-Ax for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzx3-0004FJ-MH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15962 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15962-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15962.138540045916284 (code B ref 15962); Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2013 17:27:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44830 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzwg-0004Ea-Bt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:52719) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vkzwe-0004EN-5n for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWT00G00W594I00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:27:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWT00GCMXTP3U80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 25 Nov 2013 19:27:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5a4902b7-cb15-4088-9307-dcf1fb3008b7@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80956 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 07:53:43 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org > > But the backtrace, however inaccurate, is genuine - not at all bogus; > I can assure you of that. I didn't think otherwise. By "bogus" I meant that the data was garbled, not that it was sabotaged.