From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Omitting Windows-specific parts from infrastructure changes Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:51 +0200 Message-ID: <838uh32gpg.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421402093 32492 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2015 09:54:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:54:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 16 10:54:45 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YC3c4-0001WN-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 10:54:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54867 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YC3c4-0002a9-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:54:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40016) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YC3c1-0002ZS-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:54:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YC3bw-0008KK-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:54:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:35294) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YC3bw-0008KC-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 04:54:36 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NI900600KSROV00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:20 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NI9005DCKUKDL20@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:54:20 +0200 (IST) X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181328 Archived-At: When people make infrastructure and low-level changes all over the source tree, I'd appreciate if they either include the MS-Windows specific parts in the scope of the changes, or at least tell here explicitly that this-and-that parts were omitted for such-and-such reasons. Several changes installed lately did neither, which leaves those left-out places to be discovered either by chance or by bug reports. That mode of operation makes very little sense to me. Thanks in advance.