From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19993: 25.0.50; Unicode fonts defective on Windows Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:41:39 +0200 Message-ID: <838uf4697w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a8zqo15d.fsf@gnu.org> <20150306113804.GA11886@math.berkeley.edu> <83385ins3o.fsf@gnu.org> <20150306162136.GA14179@math.berkeley.edu> <83r3t1nax7.fsf@gnu.org> <83oao5n83y.fsf@gnu.org> <20150306221351.GB16266@math.berkeley.edu> <83k2ytmd9q.fsf@gnu.org> <20150308083805.GA1763@math.berkeley.edu> <20150308084607.GA2135@math.berkeley.edu> <20150310162945.GA30876@math.berkeley.edu> <83a8zk6avh.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426009551 27807 80.91.229.3 (10 Mar 2015 17:45:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:45:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org To: ilya@math.berkeley.edu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 10 18:45:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YVODl-0005af-Cn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 18:45:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50743 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVODk-0001td-Dn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:45:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOCO-0008F4-4Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOCI-0004Ik-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOCI-0004If-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOCI-0005qS-IV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19993.142600941722423 (code B ref 19993); Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Mar 2015 17:43:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41910 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOBt-0005pa-6S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:43:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:50128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVOBq-0005pM-RY for 19993@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 13:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NL000O00BK8LB00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 19993@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:38:04 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NL000KKIBNGJ640@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:38:04 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83a8zk6avh.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100353 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 19:05:54 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 09:29:56 -0700 > > From: Ilya Zakharevich > > Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > Choosing the first font which has a subset of a character “identified” > > is not a reasonable thing to do. > > See my other messages: I'm not sure we actually do that. It's > possible that the subrange test is used only as a filter, after we > already identified the candidate fonts. In fact, it's almost certainly a filter: at least my reading of ww32font.c:font_matches_spec is that if the font spec specifies a script, then fonts that do NOT have the corresponding subrange bit set are rejected.