From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:48:53 +0200 Message-ID: <838uex1u1m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426477771 993 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2015 03:49:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 03:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 16 04:49:22 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXM1m-0004MS-Uw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:49:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXM1m-00036L-8G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXM1h-00035s-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:49:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXM1e-00017U-Io for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:49:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:47232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXM1e-000170-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLA00B00CNWD800@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:49:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLA00BQHD9VBI10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 05:49:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183892 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:02:49 -0400 > Cc: Emacs developers > > > overlays. Setting inhibit-point-motion-hooks helped, but it occurs to me > > that the operation shouldn't have been expensive in the first place. > > goto-char should never trigger any hook. Properties such as > `intangible' are misfeatures, IMO. Does that include 'point-entered' and 'point-exited' as well? If so, can you explain why they are misfeatures?