From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 11:27:47 +0300 Message-ID: <838ucf3dh8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <83h9r8egen.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5t6gex.fsf@gnu.org> <555E09AE.9070208@cs.ucla.edu> <83lhgh6fb2.fsf@gnu.org> <555E2C10.4010501@cs.ucla.edu> <83h9r5670s.fsf@gnu.org> <555E6A15.8010404@cs.ucla.edu> <831ti957wp.fsf@gnu.org> <83pp5s4uml.fsf@gnu.org> <555F740D.4030304@cs.ucla.edu> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home> <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432369693 26115 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 08:28:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 08:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 10:28:04 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4mo-0007YX-JW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 10:28:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37093 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4mn-0005K1-Lm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4mh-0005Jt-Ob for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:27:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4ma-0004bK-R3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:47955) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yw4ma-0004ax-Ia; Sat, 23 May 2015 04:27:48 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NOS00L00MYU9T00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:19:10 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NOS00IOYN3YHS20@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Sat, 23 May 2015 11:19:10 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186755 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 10:02:52 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > This seems to say that such byte offsets are the only "right" ones. > > Right. > > > But we have just established that all of the byte offsets discussed > > here, including the ones currently produced by etags, are wrong in > > ??? etags _does_ produce byte offsets, currently. The issue is their accuracy, not their existence or being byte offsets.