From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22120: Another backtrace Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:30:01 +0200 Message-ID: <838u529k5i.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bn9y9lfd.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449775886 17448 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2015 19:31:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:31:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eric Hanchrow Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 10 20:31:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a76vr-0003dk-BT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 20:31:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44087 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76vq-0001pQ-GV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:31:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53416) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76vi-0001p5-KY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:31:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76ve-00083O-Hm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:31:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:56451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a76ve-00083D-FY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76ve-0006bS-1C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22120 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22120-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22120.144977580525267 (code B ref 22120); Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22120) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2015 19:30:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39478 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76uj-0006ZT-8K for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:30:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:46983) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1a76uh-0006YV-Bt for 22120@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:30:03 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NZ500O00Q6C6Q00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 22120@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:32:26 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NZ500CW9QA181A0@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 21:32:26 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109849 Archived-At: > From: Eric Hanchrow > Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:15:52 +0000 > Cc: 22120@debbugs.gnu.org > > Can you try reproducing this in an unoptimized build? > > I was under the impression that this build _was_ unoptimized (so I was > surprised to see those variables "optimized out"). I configured with > > $ ./configure --enable-checking --enable-check-lisp-object-type --config-cache > CFLAGS=-Og -g3 > > Maybe I should add -O0 to CFLAGS. Yes, please. -Og does not prevent all of the optimizations, it just prevents some of the more aggressive ones. > (I got those options from a recent thread on emacs-devel about a > proposed new file etc/DEBUG). You may wish to re-read the beginning of that file, it says more about this now ;-) Thanks.