From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 22:12:13 +0200 Message-ID: <838u2hu6aq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87mvr9wxqz.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87io1xwq1e.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87vb5wvzfz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87io1wt4cc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <8737syoima.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <871t8iu277.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83d1s28kvh.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3gis7sm.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83twle71xy.fsf@gnu.org> <87io1us0te.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83pow26svf.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8n5srbp.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83d1s17npz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oablfpn3.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <834mdd6llx.fsf@gnu.org> <7fbb8bc7-9a97-4bad-a103-a6690a35241d@default> <834mdc5w6o.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455826502 28929 80.91.229.3 (18 Feb 2016 20:15:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, juri@linkov.net, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "John Wiegley" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 21:14:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUyL-0004hE-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:14:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45147 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUyL-00075s-8t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:14:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUvw-0002fN-RH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUvt-0002rk-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:12:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUvd-0002iQ-ME; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:11:57 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2105 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aWUvc-0006BI-St; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 15:11:57 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:15:22 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200155 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Drew Adams , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@linkov.net > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:15:22 -0800 > > I see you've kept a running tally of votes for the default nature of this > feature. Do you have a summary yet? I can count ;-) > Given the sheer volume of concerned response, both for and against, my > inclination is to vote OFF by default, until we have more experience and > understanding. However, if the tally shows a distinct majority (at least 2/3) > wanting it on by default, I'll take that account. I think it's too early to make the decision. The feedback only started to accumulate, and we are nowhere near a release. What's the rush?